3d_design

updated 2008-01-02

contents:

"Engineering design is a decision making process required to optimally convert resources into systems, components or processes to meet desired needs." -- Dr. D. A. Lucca (possibly quoting someone else).

A #design describes how to apply #tools to materials.

David Cary also maintains related pages:

design news

materials

see also

[a few extremely common materials, and a few exotic materials]

supplies

Supplies: [FIXME: is this the same as #materials ? ]

Batteries
finishing nails
wire
WD-40
superglue
Duct Tape
masking tape
scotch tape (writable with pencil)
clear contact paper
paint
spare light bulbs
ziplock bags
trash bags

tools

tools:

see also

Screwdriver
Tape measure
hammer
scissors
pliers (needle-nose)
flashlight
Dentist's Mirror
toolbox
extension cord
power strip

furniture

see also

furniture: [FIXME: house considerations ? office space ?]

chair desk bookshelves lamp trash bucket plastic mat to go under chair

book.html#peopleware

educational aspects of toys

Origami:
reminiscent of the protein folding problem of biochemistry. A little closer (than LEGOs or wooden blocks) to the true ratio of tensile strength to compressive strength of typical building materials.
Paper airplanes:
aerodynamics (duh!) #paper_airplanes
Tetris:
a good intuitive model for crystallization (materials science). After playing Tetris, it is intuitive that faster crystallization rates result in more defects / mm^3. It makes it more intuitive that eutectic alloys have certain ratios.
Air hockey:
conservation of momentum, elastic collisions, (lack of) friction. (Physics).
Pool / Billiards:
conservation of momentum, elastic collisions (Physics).
Asteroids:
the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and position (Calculus); Newton's Laws (physics).

Pet Peeve: I despise the versions that have friction -- the ones where if you turn off your engine, you start slowing down and eventually stop. This makes it unnecessarily hard to understand Einstein's theory of relativity. The completely frictionless ones are better -- since in the real world velocity *is* truly relative.

Crystal ___(???):
Asteroids + gravity (physics); "the slingshot effect" (astrophysics physics).
wood blocks:
gravity, balance, gravitational potential energy (physics) building aesthetics (architecture) 3 D shapes and manipulation (3 D geometry; mechanical engineering) (Unfortunately, wood blocks teach the exactly the wrong thing what shapes have optimum strength -- -- a stack of blocks has zero tensile strength and practically infinite compression strength, while the strongest real building materials have very high tensile strength and lower compressive strength -- making tensegrity unnecessarily difficult to understand. Better 3D manipulatives are needed ! ). ... "the SOMA cube, invented by the Danish Author Piet Hein." http://www.fam-bundgaard.dk/SOMA/SOMA.HTM points to a "solver" program that, given the outer shape, tries to fit the available pieces together to make that shape.
Better 4D manipulatives are needed ! see video_game.html#4dtoys
Legos:
wood blocks + better tensile strength; the difference between compression and tension (physics).
Rubic's snake:
the protein folding problem. (Better protein folding analogues are needed !)
Erno Rubik's cube:
the difficulty of optimization (getting sucked into local minima), group theory (Math).

Pet peeve: Please *do not* peel the stickers off and rearrange them to "fix" the cube. They never stick back on very well, and soon fall off and are lost. Instead, if you *must* have it fixed and you don't have the patience to do that merely by twisting, *guess what's inside first*, then *take it apart* into "individual cubes". It's quite surprising how the whole thing holds together (mechanical engineering). Sure, it's "looser" after you do this, but easier-to-spin is not a bad thing. [FIXME: describe exactly how to get the 1st cube out, or link to a page that does.] http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=rubik [FIXME: do I need 2 copies, 1 here, one at dav_info.html ?]

[rubik cube / typography ?] http://www.lineto.com/application.html?ID=122&dir_id=121

Rubik's Cube by Karl Dahlke http://www.eklhad.net/rubik/ has a on-line program that allows you to enter your current rubic's cube configuration, and it tells you step-by-step how to solve it. (You can download the source code to the program).

``As far as I know I am the fastest active cuber in Britain with a best average of 23.0 seconds'' -- stiff_hands http://homepage.ntlworld.com/angela.hayden/cube/cube_frontpage.html

Dominos:
"the domino effect", conversion between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy (physics). Digital bit regeneration (communication theory).
Lemmings:
parallel processing (Computer Science).
HTML:
helps understand the difference between the 2 views of a program: design time v. run time. (Computer Science).
team sports:
teamwork, coordination, communication. (sociology, psychology) (Physics).

architecture

traditional architecture (designing buildings on the ground to support the humans inside).

related to learning.html , #design , #synergetics , #city [should I move ``city design'' info there ?], #spacecraft_design , #furniture , computer_architecture.html ,

news links:

other links:

design

Design, in general.

What I call "general design" seems to be the same as what others call "the meta-field of design" (Adam Greenfield) and "design science" (Buckminster Fuller).

See also simplicity

see also spacecraft_design

see also FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt) learning.html#fud

see also general-purpose tools vs. single-purpose tools #general_purpose

general-purpose tools vs. single-purpose tools

general-purpose tools vs. single-purpose tools.

see also generalize vs. specialize dav_info.html#generalize_specialize

DAV: I am having a little cognitive dissonance here.

On one hand, I think it's really cool to have general-purpose tools. General-purpose PCs that can do lots of things never envisioned by their original designer, ... PDAs that can accept new and improved software ... multipurpose tools that do lots of stuff and still fit in your pocket (rather than having to carry around an entire tackle box of single-purpose tools) ...

On the other hand, single-purpose tools are also nice. ... telephones that ``just work'', unlike some PDA/cellphone combos that seem to crash regularly ... ... A knife that's just a knife ... ... The single purpose tools in Unix ``cut'', ``sort'', etc. ... email handling programs that just handle email, rather than displaying animated graphics and relaying virus programs to everyone else in your address book ... tools that are optimized to do one thing well, and when you have a collection of them and one does not work, all the rest of them are unaffected. (In other words, when you let someone else borrow one tool, or one tool wears out or breaks, or the batteries in one tool are drained, or you lose a tool). ... multipurpose tools often have one thing they do well, but all other secondary abilities are a compromise.

The importance of scalability/upgradeability: idea_space.html#level It's much easier to improve my collection of tools (not only in dollar cost, but in time spent learning how to use the new, improved collection) if I can simply add a simple new tool and learn how to use it, then (after I am comfortable with the new tool) discarding old tools it makes redundant. As opposed to getting a complicated new tool, spending much longer getting used to its new quirks, then trying to remember all the different functions of complicated old tools, worring that if I discard this old tool, even though most of its functions are obsoleted by the old tool, perhaps I might still need this old tool to do the 1 or 2 things that the new tool doesn't do as well -- or worse, doesn't do at all.

Occasionally one thing can be both ``simple'' and ``multifunctional'' -- graphic display hardware without complex arbitrary restrictions on what text/colors can go where ... ... paper for origami folding ... bookshelves that are smart enough *not* to make every shelf the same height, so that they can hold all different sizes of books or display objects d'art without wasting lots of space, ... dremel tools come close ... what else ?

simplicity

I think simplicity is such a important general design rule that it deserves a section all by itself.

related local pages:

synergetics

Stuff related to Buckminster Fuller (who apparently coined the word "synergy"), his World Game, and geometry. (tensegrity ?)

Related to

Other pages with long list of Buckminster Fuller links:

geometric shapes

sphere approximation

Often we want to approximate a sphere by a few points (the vertices of a polyhedron) or by a few pieces of paper (the gores of a globe).

The opposite problem is #sphere_packing.

See also #map_software for more map projections.

I've been thinking about building my own globe. Rather than approximating it with some sort of polyhedra made of flat polygons, I've been thinking about approximating it out of pieces of paper that are curved. (Unfortunately, paper can only curve in one direction ... which is what makes "map projection" so difficult -- the globe is not a developable surface ). Perhaps the intersecting cylinders illustrated by Paul Bourke would be much better than the standard thin globe gores.

sphere packing

filling space with a bunch of spheres, or filling some area with a collection of circles (possibly unequal-sized).

Cool Maps

[2004-01-24:DavidCary I moved this from http://rdrop.com/~cary/html/3d_design.html#maps to http://visual.wiki.taoriver.net/moin.cgi/EarthMap ; this is now an old archive]

contents:

See also:

maps with driving directions

weather maps

other online maps

(and a few of the most interesting paper maps ... should I split out paper maps into their own category ?) (also photographs of Earth, Luna, and other planets)

map_software

[FIXME: merge with other heading of same name]

map software

ready-to-run mapping software; and (non-image) raw map data. See #sphere_approximation for other "projections" and other ideas and algorithms that might be useful for mapping software

city information

finding interesting places on Earth

other map stuff

automobile design

flying car

skyhook design

skyhooks, space elevators, beanstalks, etc.

also Loftstrom loops.

Designing a skyhook has some similarities to #spacecraft_design , yet in other ways it's completely different than any artifact ever built before.

"space elevator" appears stationary (perhaps with minor vibrations) to someone standing on Earth (or whatever planet it is installed on). The "skyhook" appears to spin; typically one end comes down to (near) the planet surface, grabs the cargo, then pulls back out ... and releases it somewhere out in space. "rotavators, which are basically rotating shorter space elevators in lower orbits"